Mustikan terveyshyödyt tomaatista! Violetti tomaatti!

Ethän kerro kaikille tätä, se on vielä topsecret?

"ampeerit"

Mennä vuosituhannella kirjoitettiin samanlaista tekstiä sinisenvioletista perunasta- Lajin nimi oli Synkeä Sakari. Eipä ole kuulunut mitään sen jälkeen. Yhden perunanpalan sain työkaverin eväistä, aivan tavalliselle perunalle se maistui, väri vain oli toinen. Ei löydy kaupoista!

Syö hyvää, syö oikein.

https://www.news-medical.net/health/Purple-Power-Evidence-Based-Health-Benefits-of-Anthocyanin-Rich-Diets.aspx

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/02/nutritionist-from-japan-shares-foods-she-eats-every-day-to-stay-healthy-young-and-live-longer.html

Mustikka, variksenmarja, juolukka, mustaherukka, aronia, marjatuomipihlaja jne...

"markkinat"

Pensasmustikka kestää pakastusta, sekä maistuu paremmalle.

https://tiedebasaari.wordpress.com/2012/11/17/mustikan-ja-pensasmustikan-antosyaani-variyhdisteet-ovat-erittain-tehokkaita-antioksidantteja-jo-erittain-pienina-pitoisuuksina/

"markkinat"

Närpiössä yksi mestari kokeili. Maistui.

https://yle.fi/a/74-20109570

https://www.is.fi/terveys/art-2000012039851.html

Variksenmarja on erinomaista.

https://northernbushcraft.com/topic.php?name=crowberry®ion=lb&ctgy=edible_berries


"markkinat"

Bio on perinnettä.

Geenimuunnellut ruoat ovat tutkitusti turvallisia ja jopa terveellisiä.

Oletko, aloittaja, muuten lukenut Henry Millerin ja Gregory Conkon teosta nimeltä The Frankenfood myth: How protest and politics threaten the biotech revolution?

Heti Millerin ja Conkon teoksen alussa, jo ennen prologia, on iskevät alkusanat Texasin A&M-yliopiston maatalous-professorilta, Norman E. Borlaugilta siitä miten ylisäännöstely on monesti uhannut kusta tieteellisen kehityksen muroihin:
"Regulators are not alone in their demands for ever-increasing margins of safety. It seems we are born with an instinct to resist change and to regard what is new with suspicion, while forgetting the faults and risks that were readily tolerated in the past and that were eliminated or ameliorated by new technologies; chlorination of water, pasteurization, and vaccination readily come to mind. Our very wealth and well-being, made possible by technology, now seem to offer the luxury of forgoing additional advances. But we are hard put to equal the immortal observation of the head of the U.S. patent office at the dawning of the twentieth century who suggested that the office be closed because surely everything possible had already been invented.
"We must be more rational about our approach to risks. We need to think in broader terms, recognizing, for example, that the world cannot feed all its 6.3 billion people from organic farms or power all its cities and industries by wind and solar energy.
"Although we must be prudent in assessing new technologies, these assessments must not be based on overly conservative - or overtly inaccurate - assumptions or be swayed by the anti-business, anti-establishment, anti-globalization agendas of a few activists, or by the self-interest of bureaucrats. They must be based on good science and good sense. It is easy to forget that science offers more than a body of knowledge and a process for adding new knowledge. It tells us not only what we know but what we don't know. It identifies areas of uncertainty and offers an estimate of how great and how critical that uncertainty may be."

Henry Miller, Gregory Conko
The Frankenfood myth: How protest and politics threaten the biotech revolution
alkusanat, s. xii
Norman E. Borlaug, Texas A&M University, Nobel Peace Laureate 1970